Outcome-Based Education, engineered end to end

From enrollment to attainment, in one system.

MavericEdu runs the full academic lifecycle for universities — courses, attendance, assessment and exams — computes OBE attainment from question-wise marks against the program outcomes you define, and compiles it into the evidence pack your accreditation cycle asks for.

2Enrollment modes
CO → POMapped & attained
Web + mobileOffline-capable
DossierPDF · Excel · ZIP
CO → PO mapping & attainment live
CO addresses PO Not mapped Att. = measured from marks
Program attainment 0%
Open-credit & batch enrollment GPS geofenced attendance OTP-verified sessions CO → PO mapping Formative & summative marks Randomised proctored quizzes Exam committees & tabulation OBE & traditional transcripts Attainment reports · PDF & Excel Accreditation evidence packs Section readiness & sign-off Frozen on finalize Faculty, qualifications & publications Progression, retention & graduation rates Android & iOS student app Open-credit & batch enrollment GPS geofenced attendance OTP-verified sessions CO → PO mapping Formative & summative marks Randomised proctored quizzes Exam committees & tabulation OBE & traditional transcripts Attainment reports · PDF & Excel Accreditation evidence packs Section readiness & sign-off Frozen on finalize Faculty, qualifications & publications Progression, retention & graduation rates Android & iOS student app
The platform

One system for the entire academic operation.

Every module shares one record of students, courses and outcomes — so nothing is re-keyed and nothing drifts out of sync.

Enrollment

Open-credit & batch

Enrol a whole batch into its scheduled courses, or register students per term against course offerings with capacity limits. Bulk CSV import for either.

Attendance

GPS + OTP verified

A session is anchored to the classroom when the teacher opens it. Students mark in only from inside the geofence, with the code for that class. No proxy marking, no paper sheets.

Courses

Course management

Course outlines, learning outcomes and assessment plans in one place — published as a formatted outline document per offering.

Assessment

Randomised proctored quizzes

Build a question bank by CSV, then generate a different paper for every student. Sittings are geofenced, OTP-gated and time-boxed.

Exams & marks

Formative & summative

Attendance, formative and summative marks compose into one result per course. Question-wise marks are tagged to outcomes, so attainment falls out of grading.

OBE

Outcome engine

Map course outcomes onto program outcomes, PEOs and the Washington Accord knowledge profile — then compute attainment against your own thresholds.

Reports

Transcripts & reports

Traditional and OBE transcripts, grade sheets, tabulation sheets and attainment reports — as PDF or Excel, on demand.

Examinations

Committees & tabulation

Constitute an exam committee, assign examiners, and run single, double or third-examiner moderation. Grade sheets and tabulation sheets generate from the same ledger.

Mobile

Student & teacher app

Teachers open sessions and students mark in from Android or iOS. Marks captured out of signal are queued on the device and sync when the network returns.

Analytics

Grade distribution

Letter-grade spread, pass rate and average GPA for an examination — whole cohort or one course, with incompletes counted separately from failures.

Improvement

CQI feedback

Instructors record what fell short and what they will change, against the course and cohort it happened in — the closing half of the loop, kept with the evidence.

Governance

Policy & access control

Grading schemes, mark distributions and attainment thresholds resolve faculty → program → department. Roles are defined per endpoint, and admins are scoped to their department.

Accreditation

Evidence packs

Compile a programme's outcome evidence into a sectioned dossier. Computed sections resolve live while the pack is a draft, and freeze the moment you finalize it.

Faculty

Qualifications & research

Degrees, rank, appointment type, experience and publications — imported from your HR roster. Student–faculty ratio and five-year research output are derived, not typed.

Cohorts

Progression & retention

Semester progression, cohort retention and graduation rates, computed against your faculty's own passing GPA and graduating-credit policy — never a hardcoded assumption.

Assurance

Section sign-off

A named approver signs a section, and the signature records a fingerprint of exactly what they saw. It goes stale the moment a mark underneath it moves.

The OBE engine

Attainment that computes itself.

Stop assembling accreditation evidence in spreadsheets after the fact. In MavericEdu, every question-wise mark a student earns flows through the mapping you defined and lands as measured attainment.

01

Define outcomes

Author course outcomes and the program catalogues alongside them — POs, Programme Educational Objectives, and the Washington Accord knowledge profile and complex problem/activity ranges.

02

Map the matrix

Tick which program outcomes each course outcome addresses. One matrix, curated per program, is the single source of truth every report reads.

03

Assess against them

Tag each exam question to a course outcome. Formative and summative marks are then attributed to outcomes automatically as they are entered.

04

Attain & analyse

Attainment is computed per outcome — by course, cohort, term, student and program — against thresholds you set, flagging every outcome below target.

05

Report & close the loop

Export attainment reports and OBE grade sheets as PDF or Excel, and record instructor CQI feedback against the courses that fell short.

Accreditation packs

The dossier, compiled — not assembled.

A submission is not a report. It is a hundred-page dossier drawn from a dozen sources. MavericEdu compiles the half that is computable, asks for the half it cannot know, and tells you at every moment what is still missing.

Computed

Resolved from the record, never retyped

Programme identity, vision and mission, the five outcome catalogues and the four matrices between them, curriculum structure, the CO→PO articulation, assessment instruments, PO attainment against target, grade distribution, the faculty table and student–faculty ratio, progression and graduation rates, five-year research output, and the CQI log. Every table states the rule it used — including exactly which students its denominator counts.

Authored

The sections only you can write

Context, self-critique and improvement plans are written in place, each against a prompt for what that section has to argue. The prose is the slow part of a submission — and the part that does not depend on anyone's numbering, so it can start long before a cycle opens.

Annexed

Paperwork that stays identifiable

Lab inventories, library returns, MoUs and audited accounts attach with a required caption. In the bundle each one is filed under that caption — 01-library-holdings-return.pdf, not scan0007.pdf — with a manifest tying every file back to the section it evidences, and naming what is absent rather than quietly dropping it.

Signed off

Stale means contradicted, not old

A named approver signs a section and the approval stores a fingerprint of precisely what they were looking at. The section is flagged stale when its content no longer matches — so a mark entered this morning can invalidate an approval, and a section untouched for two years that nothing has contradicted stays green. Revert the change and the approval stands again.

Frozen

What you submitted still reproduces

Attainment is computed from marks that keep moving. On finalize, every computed section resolves once and freezes — the screen, the PDF and the workbook all show the figures as of that day, and every further edit is refused. Reopening requires a note, and the superseded snapshot is kept permanently, so an assessor's question eighteen months later has an exact answer.

Bundled

One request, the whole handover

The dossier as PDF with a table of contents and page numbers, an Excel companion of every data table because assessors ask for the underlying numbers, and a ZIP of both plus the annexures. If the predicted page numbers disagree with the rendered file, the contents prints unnumbered — a wrong page number in a submitted dossier is worse than none.

We say provisional when it is provisional.

MavericEdu compiles the evidence for an accreditation submission — it does not fill in the accreditor's forms. Our BAETE- and BAC-shaped templates carry our own section names and no criterion numbers, and are labelled provisional everywhere they appear, because putting an invented criterion reference on a real submission is worse than leaving it blank. When a published format is in hand, the numbering is filled in and released as a new versioned template; the prose and annexures you have already collected carry straight across.

What finalizes today is your own outcome evidence record — signed, frozen, and reproducible years later. That is the section every institution currently assembles by hand in spreadsheets, and it is the one we compute completely.

Accreditation in Bangladesh

BAC and BAETE — two accreditors, two different questions.

Bangladeshi universities answer to two accrediting bodies, and they do not ask for the same thing. Knowing which one you are preparing for changes what evidence you need to start collecting, and when.

BAC

Bangladesh Accreditation Council

The national, all-discipline accreditor

A statutory body created by the Bangladesh Accreditation Council Act, 2017, accrediting higher education institutions and their academic programmes across every discipline — business, science, humanities and engineering alike. It works through the Bangladesh National Qualifications Framework (BNQF), and leans heavily on the institutional half of quality assurance: governance, faculty, student support, facilities and the internal quality system.

  • EstablishedAct of Parliament, March 2017
  • ScopeAll disciplines, institutional and programme level
  • FrameworkBangladesh National Qualifications Framework
  • EligibilityBachelor's level or above, and at least one batch graduated two years before you apply
BAETE

Board of Accreditation for Engineering and Technical Education

The engineering accreditor, under the IEB

Established in 2003 as an independent board of the Institution of Engineers, Bangladesh, BAETE accredits undergraduate engineering programmes. It is outcome-based to the core: programmes are assessed against Programme Educational Objectives, Programme Outcomes, and the Washington Accord's knowledge profile (WK), complex problem (P) and complex activity (A) ranges — with attainment evidenced from actual student assessment.

  • Established2003, under the Institution of Engineers, Bangladesh
  • ScopeUndergraduate engineering programmes
  • BasisOutcome-based education — PEOs, POs, WK / P / A
  • AccordProvisional signatory 2016, full signatory June 2024

Why the Washington Accord matters. On 12 June 2024 BAETE was admitted as a full signatory of the Washington Accord, unanimously approved by the existing signatories at the International Engineering Alliance meetings. Under the Accord, signatories recognise each other's accredited engineering qualifications as substantially equivalent — so a graduate of a BAETE-accredited programme is recognised on the same footing as one accredited in Australia, Canada, India, Japan, the UK or the US. That status is what turns outcome attainment from a paperwork exercise into something with a passport attached.

What is the difference between BAC and BAETE accreditation?

BAETE accredits engineering programmes and is Washington Accord aligned, so it asks for outcome attainment traced to question-wise assessment. BAC is the national accreditor across all disciplines and asks a broader institutional question — governance, faculty, finance, facilities, student support and the internal quality system — alongside programme outcomes. An engineering department may pursue both; they are not alternatives to each other.

How far back does accreditation data need to go?

Further than most departments expect. BAC requires that at least one batch has completed graduation two years before the date of application, which means the evidence has to cover a cohort's whole journey, not a recent snapshot. If you begin collecting when the cycle opens, the years you most need are already behind you.

What evidence does an OBE self-assessment report need?

The parts nobody can reconstruct afterwards: course outcomes mapped to programme outcomes, assessment tagged to those outcomes, attainment computed against a stated threshold for a named cohort, and a record of what changed as a result. Most institutions assemble that by hand in spreadsheets in the months before a visit.

The rest — facilities, MoUs, financial statements — is paperwork you already have. It is the attainment trail that has to be built as you teach.

What is an IQAC and how does it relate to BAC and BAETE accreditation?

The University Grants Commission has pushed universities to establish Institutional Quality Assurance Cells as the standing body responsible for self-assessment and continuous improvement. In practice the IQAC is who assembles an accreditation submission — and who needs outcome attainment, programme review and CQI records to be available year-round rather than compiled in a panic.

Does MavericEdu produce a finished BAC or BAETE submission?

No, and we would rather say so plainly. MavericEdu compiles the evidence — outcome catalogues, the CO→PO matrix, attainment against target, progression and graduation rates, faculty and research records, and the CQI log — into a sectioned dossier with the figures frozen on the day you sign off.

Our BAETE- and BAC-shaped templates use our own section names and carry no criterion numbers, and are labelled provisional wherever they appear, because putting an invented criterion reference on a real submission is worse than leaving it blank. When a published format is in hand, the numbering is filled in and released as a versioned template — and the prose and annexures you have already collected carry straight across.

Does outcome-based accreditation work for non-engineering programmes?

Yes. The outcome engine is discipline-neutral — a Bachelor of Business defines its own programme outcomes and maps its own course outcomes onto them. What is engineering-specific is the Washington Accord knowledge profile and the complex problem and activity ranges, and a BAC-shaped pack drops those entirely rather than asking a business programme for its WK mapping.

Attendance

Attendance you can actually trust.

Every session is anchored to the classroom. Students mark in only when they're inside the geofence and hold the one-time code the instructor released for that class.

  • GPS geofence pins presence to the room, not the campus gate
  • A per-session OTP that expires, so a code is no use in the next class
  • Live roster, exportable registers, and attendance shortfall visible per student
481206
Session code · expires in 4:58
Transcripts & reports

The evidence your accreditation cycle asks for.

Generate the traditional transcript a registrar signs and the outcome attainment an accreditor reviews — from the same record, with no reconciliation in between.

  • Traditional transcripts with GPA, CGPA and credits — by semester or trimester
  • OBE transcripts showing attainment per program outcome
  • Grade sheets, tabulation sheets and attainment reports as PDF or Excel
  • A compiled accreditation dossier with contents and page numbers, an Excel companion of every table, and a ZIP of both with the annexures
  • Compiles as a background job — the request returns immediately, the artifact downloads instantly thereafter
Academic TranscriptTraditional
Data StructuresCSE-211A
AlgorithmsCSE-311A−
Database SystemsCSE-321A
OBE Attainment RecordAttainment
PO1 · Engineering knowledge3.2/4Attained
PO2 · Problem analysis2.9/4Attained
PO3 · Design solutions2.5/4Attained
PO9 · Teamwork3.4/4Attained
Cumulative across every term · computed from question-wise marks
Class assessment

No two students sit the same paper.

Upload a question bank as CSV and MavericEdu builds each student a paper of its own — questions drawn in a different order, from different groups, with the multiple-choice options shuffled. Two neighbours see two different tests.

  • MCQ, true/false, fill-in-the-blanks, matching and short answer
  • Short answers scored by text similarity, with borderline ones queued for review
  • Publish immediately, or hold results until a teacher has reviewed them
  • Geofence, OTP, biometric and screen-capture rules adjustable mid-sitting
  • Marked papers downloadable by student and teacher afterwards
Paper · Student BSeeded
Q1  Complexity of merge sortMCQ2
Q2  A stack is ____ orderBlank1
Q3  Define a spanning treeShort5
Paper · Student ASeeded
Q1  Define a spanning treeShort5
Q2  Complexity of merge sortMCQ2
Q3  Match the traversal to its orderMatch4
Q4  A stack is ____ orderBlank1
Same bank, same marks total — a different paper per student
Enrollment

Built for how your university actually enrolls.

Whether your programs move in fixed cohorts or let students shape their own path, MavericEdu handles both without a second system.

Mode 01

Batch mode

For programs where a cohort moves together through a fixed curriculum, semester by semester.

  • Auto-enroll an entire batch into its scheduled courses
  • Semester-wise course lists, with one grade sheet per batch examination
  • Attendance-eligibility thresholds applied across the cohort
Mode 02

Open-credit mode

For flexible, credit-based programs where students take course offerings each trimester rather than moving as a fixed cohort.

  • Per-offering enrolment by the registrar, singly or by CSV, within capacity
  • Grades composed per offering — no batch examination required
  • Active, dropped and completed status per enrolment, honoured by every report
Founding Architect
MavericSoft
20 years teaching in university classrooms
Trainer of Trainers — comprehensive OBE policy
Top Software Engineering ToT, certified by JICA
Fluent in BAC & BAETE accreditation practice
Why I built MavericEdu
Faculty lose countless hours mapping and calculating attainment — time spent on documentation instead of learning modern, active teaching and assessment. MavericEdu exists to flip that: teachers focus on teaching and assessment, and the right tool handles the rest
— The MavericEdu architect University educator · OBE & software engineering trainer
Bring it to your campus

See MavericEdu on your own programs.

We'll walk your team through enrollment, attendance and class assessment, run attainment live on a program structure like yours, and compile the evidence pack that falls out of it.